- Click here for the full review (subscribers only).
Abstract
- Most cases of high-grade anogenital
dysplasia and malignancy are caused
by human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes
16 and 18. Anogenital papilloma
and condyloma acuminata are mainly
caused by HPV6 and HPV11.
- A recombinant vaccine covering
these four genotypes is now marketed
in the European Union for the prevention
of condyloma, precancerous
lesions, and cancers of the female lower
genital tract.
- A three-dose vaccination schedule
(0, 2 and 6 months) elicits an immune
response in almost all women, but the
minimum antibody titre required for
clinical protection is not known.
Immune protection lasts at least
5 years, but no one knows what happens
after that time.
- Three double-blind randomised
placebo-controlled trials involving a
total of about 18 000 women aged 16
to 23 had sufficiently similar designs
to pool results for analysis. Nearly all
(around 98%) of women not yet infected
with papillomavirus of a genotype
covered by the vaccine were protected
from dysplasia caused by one of
these genotypes. The vaccine did not
affect dysplasia caused by other genotypes,
nor was it effective in women
who were already infected. In total,
among women not yet infected with a
papillomavirus genotype covered by
the vaccine, the vaccine prevented
about 38% of high-grade dysplasias of
all types (0.5 versus 0.8 cases per
100 woman-years).
- The vaccine also markedly reduced
the incidence of genital warts and
high-grade vulvar and vaginal dysplasia.
There are no data on efficacy
beyond 4.5 years.
- These results are somewhat undermined
by methodological problems,
such as follow-up lasting only a maximum
of 4.5 years whereas cervical
cancer takes much longer to develop.
In addition, there were very few cases
of dysplasia in each trial, and results
were largely based on post hoc subgroup
analyses.
- Apart from local reactions, which
occurred in more than 80% of vaccinated
women, the only adverse effect
of papillomavirus vaccination was
fever (12.9% of those on the vaccine
versus 11% on placebo).
- There is no evidence thus far that
prenatal exposure due to HPV vaccination
during the month preceding
conception is harmful.
- The clinical results are promising
but further follow-up is needed to
answer ongoing questions, such as the
incidence of cervical cancer after vaccination
and the duration of protection.
Cervical cancer screening
remains necessary, even for vaccinated
women, and a continued need
exists for measures designed to prevent
all sexually transmitted diseases.
©Prescrire July 2007
Source: Prescrire International 2007; 16 (89): 91-94.
- Click here for the full review (subscribers only).
- More articles in Prescrire's "Spotlight"...