Spotlight

Every month, the subjects in Prescrire’s Spotlight.

100 most recent :  1 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90

Look to the past

 Editorial  When a product arrives on the market, it doesn't appear out of nowhere. It has a past. It may be a slightly improved version of a well-established product, or one of several prototypes that have been in development for many years. Or perhaps a substance derived from a product that was abandoned because it proved to be of no value or too dangerous, etc. The story around the development of a new product always contains useful information on which to reflect, in order to understand and make informed decisions.
Full article available for download (FREE)

One example in the field of health care is the now-withdrawn drug benfluorex (formerly marketed as Mediator°), whose serious adverse effects could have been anticipated in light of past experience with the other amphetamine-like appetite suppressants (see, for example, "Mediator° disaster: the damning appeal judgement", Prescrire Int December 2024).

Or the gliflozins, which lower blood glucose by inhibiting sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), and were shown in the mid-2010s to cause diabetic ketoacidosis. Again, this adverse effect could have been foreseen much earlier, since, back in the late 19th century, ketoacidosis had been reported with phlorizin, a naturally-occurring substance whose effects include SGLT2 inhibition (see "Memory can save lives", Prescrire Int November 2020).

Or the various cholesterol-lowering drugs developed since the 1960s. One of the lessons from their past is that an effect on a surrogate endpoint is no guarantee of an improvement in clinical outcomes (see "50 years of cholesterol-regulating drugs: what benefits?", Prescrire Int September 2016).

More recently, past experience with amyloid-beta-targeting drugs proved a source of valuable information, when, in 2025, lecanemab (Leqembi°) became the first of this class to be authorised in the European Union for Alzheimer's disease (see "Lecanemab (Leqembi°) in early Alzheimer's disease" Prescrire Int April 2026). The story of this class starts in the 1990s and involves the development of dozens of substances that lacked clinical efficacy, yet were shown to have serious adverse effects, including brain lesions. Before authorising lecanemab, drug regulatory agencies should have taken this information into account and demanded robust evidence, from at least two clinical trials, of sufficient clinical efficacy to make the risk of such serious adverse effects acceptable.

Various sources of information are used to assess whether a drug improves patient care, including clinical trial results and pharmacovigilance data. But it is also useful to look to the past and retrace its history.

 ©Prescrire 1 April 2026

Source: "Look to the past" Prescrire Int 2026; 35 (280): 87. FREE.


Filet

Enjoy full access to Prescrire International, and support independent information

 

Share
Share on  Facebook  
 
 
See also:
 
"Lecanemab (Leqembi°)
in early Alzheimer's disease"
Prescrire Int 2026;
35 (280): 89-94. 
Subscribers only

"Mediator° disaster: the
damning appeal judgement"
Prescrire Int 2024;
33 (265): 303-306.
FREE
 
"Memory can save lives"
Prescrire Int 2020;
29 (220): 255. 
FREE
 
"50 years of
cholesterol-regulating
drugs: what benefits?"
Prescrire Int 2016;
25 (174): 205.
Subscribers only